OPPOSE BUSHY: 01/16/2005 - 01/23/2005



Saturday, January 22, 2005

Trent Lott, Swearing by Mississippi (washingtonpost.com)

Trent Lott, Swearing by Mississippi (washingtonpost.com)Trent Lott, Swearing by Mississippi
Senator's Inaugural Plan Includes a Large Dose Of His Home State

By Mike Allen
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, January 6, 2005; Page C04

When Sen. Trent Lott fell from grace with his Republican colleagues two years ago and resigned as majority leader, he was given a variety of lesser assignments that included heading up the arrangements for the next inauguration -- the swearing-in, not the fun parts like the balls and parade.

But Lott had his fun, anyway. The senator held a conference call yesterday to detail his program, which is packed with gospel music, Mississippians and even a gospel singer from Mississippi.


Sure, there are standards such as "God of Our Fathers" and the national anthem. There is also "Let the Eagle Soar," written by soon-to-be-former Attorney General John Ashcroft.

Alas, Gen. Ashcroft, as his staff calls him, will not be singing

Let the Eagle Soar- GUY HOVIS SINGS and elicits vomiting

The Political Puzzle v2.0: Let Eagles Soar
"The Political Puzzle v2.0


Surviving in the Bizzaro world of Bush
contact home | about | posting privileges | become a columnist | master archives | 30 minute IQ test | Bandwidth Test
« Voting reform | Main | Does Being Truthful Matter »

January 05, 2005
Let Eagles Soar

Filed under: Can't stop laughing


Dick Cheney will be sworn in by Dennis Hassert, the House Speaker.

Guy Hovis, a vocalist from Tupelo, Miss., who performed on the Lawrence Welk show, will sing, "Let the Eagles Soar," a song written by Attorney General John Ashcroft."
========SNIP============
I almost lost my breakfast watching that Guy Hovis clown sing that Ashcroft tune. Ashcroft has a much better vibratto and falsetto in his version.
~Code

Friday, January 21, 2005

The Inaugural Parade

The 2005 Coronation of King George the Cowardly.

Well, our national trip down the Rabbithole of Alice in Wonderland was made complete with the Coronation of King George the Cowardly. As I watched the "parade", it was bizarre to say the least. There were vehicles moving in a V formation like the flying phalanx of ancient Sparta...there were Matrix like guys in dark sunglasses and long, black overcoats flanking the "Presidential limo", and at one point, there was a truck that came rolling along that had armed thugs hanging on the side that a friend watching the procession remarked to me, looked like the Mob, much like something you would see from the Al Capone era, when armed thugs would be festooning a vehicle's exterior, with their feet implanted on the running boards of the truck or car.

It looked less like a Presidential inauguration parade (I've never seen one of them), and more like Hitler's triumphant march into Poland or Paris. Actually, if some of the Men in Black had been sporting the traditional silver SS pins or Death's Head pins, the picture would have been complete....all Bushy would need would be a tiny little moustache (but perhaps, he cannot muster enough testosterone to generate one).

In another portion of the program, Hitler...er, uh, BUSHY, was addressing / commanding people from a large white podium, which was reminiscent of something you saw Il Duce (Mussolini) or Hitler do, in old film reels. His Effete Foppishness was. for all the world, an effeminate version of Big Brother re-enacted for all the world to see.

To say that the Inauguration Parade looked like the New World Order in all its "glory" would be to understate the matter.

As the tanks and troops marched down the road, even the commentators on ABC said it looked like something you would see in a Banana republic, at the direction of some dictator. As they say..."TRUE DAT".

Along the parade route, it was teeming with people, held behind great fences which, for some reason, looked like the fences at Auschwitz . And, we saw the police running along the fences, often spraying pepper spray into the eyes of these law abiding citizens whose only crime was exercising their right of free speech.

While our own citizens are starving, and troops don't have what they need, Marie Antoinette...er...Mrs. Bush, was prancing around in a solid white Oscar de la Renta that costs TWENTY THOUSAND DOLLARS. Talk about letting them eat cake and fiddling while Rome burned...surely, their little pageant needs to reserve a rank in the history books as at least as outrageous as these. Estimates of forty to forty four MILLION dollars for this little debacle, are said to be low.

To me, it certainly adds up to a new definition of an obscene waste of money...but of course, the money is from "private" sources, which is the easy way of saying it oozes from the teats of the Pigopolists, each vying for the ability to muzzle in on the treasure trove which will be available to Bushy's toadies.

So, as Alex in Clockwork Orange might say in Nadsat, "Yes my little droogies, even the melodies of the Glorious Ludwig von....were soured by that scene. Bushy is a baddiwad chelloveck!".

During one scene, the "Presidential Limo" rolled through a tremendous cloud of smoke/fog, coming from a heating vent or something in the road. As it emerged eerily from the grey cloud, it looked like Dracula tooling around Transylvania, with his black coated, black sunglassed Familiars in attendance.

And so, the New Nightmare Begins.

~CodeWarriorz Thoughts

Wednesday, January 19, 2005

What planet is CONDOLEEZA From?


Monday, January 17, 2005

MLK HAD A DREAM,BUSH GIVES US A NIGHTMARE

Sunday, January 16, 2005
BBC NEWS | World | Americas | 'I have a dream'
BBC NEWS | World | Americas | 'I have a dream'
"The dream

I have a dream that one day this nation will rise up and live out the true meaning of its creed - we hold these truths to be self-evident: that all men are created equal.

I have a dream that one day on the red hills of Georgia the sons of former slaves and the sons of former slave-owners will be able to sit down together at a table of brotherhood.

I have a dream that one day even the state of Mississippi, a desert state, sweltering with the heat of injustice and oppression, will be transformed into an oasis of freedom and justice.

I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.

I have a dream today!

I have a dream that one day, down in Alabama, with its vicious racists, with its governor having his lips dripping with the words of interposition and nullification; one day right there in Alabama little black boys and little black girls will be able to join hands with little white boys and white girls as sisters and brothers.

I have a dream today!

I have a dream that one day every valley shall be exalted, every hill and mountain shall be made low, the rough places will be made plain, and the crooked places will be made straight, and the glory of the Lord shall be revealed, and all flesh shall see it together.

This is our hope. This is the faith that I will go back to the South with. With this faith we will be able to hew out of the mountain of despair a stone of hope.

With this faith we will be able to transform the jangling discords of our nation into a beautiful symphony of brotherhood. With this faith we will be able to work together, to pray together, to struggle together, to go to jail together, to stand up for freedom together, knowing that we will be free one day.

This will be the day, this will be the day when all of God's children will be able to sing with a new meaning: "My country, 'tis of thee, sweet land of liberty, of thee I sing. Land where my fathers died, land of the pilgrim's pride, from every mountainside, let freedom ring." And if America is to be a great nation, this must become true.

And so let freedom ring from the prodigious hilltops of New Hampshire.
Let freedom ring from the mighty mountains of New York.
Let freedom ring from the heightening Alleghenies of Pennsylvania!
Let freedom ring from the snow-capped Rockies of Colorado.
Let freedom ring from the curvaceous peaks of California.
But not only that.
Let freedom ring from Stone Mountain of Georgia.
Let freedom ring from Lookout Mountain of Tennessee.
Let freedom ring from every hill and every molehill of Mississippi, from every mountainside, let freedom ring!

And when this happens, when we allow freedom to ring, when we let it ring from every village and every hamlet, from every state and every city, we will be able to speed up that day when all of God's children, black men and white men, Jews and Gentiles, Protestants and Catholics, will be able to join hands and sing in the words of the old Negro spiritual: "Free at last! Free at last! thank God Almighty, we are free at last!" "
===============SNIP====================
The dream died with the election of GWB...

Bush replaced the dream with his version of Alice Cooper's tune...
"WELCOME TO MY NIGHTMARE"

Sunday, January 16, 2005

http://inauguration-of-bush.blogspot.com/

US PONDERED USE OF A "GAY BOMB"

"US military pondered love not war"
US military pondered love not war

The unconventional proposals were made by the US Air Force
The US military investigated building a "gay bomb", which would make enemy soldiers "sexually irresistible" to each other, government papers say.
Other weapons that never saw the light of day include one to make soldiers obvious by their bad breath.

The US defence department considered various non-lethal chemicals meant to disrupt enemy discipline and morale.

The 1994 plans were for a six-year project costing $7.5m, but they were never pursued.

The US Air Force Wright Laboratory in Dayton, Ohio, sought Pentagon funding for research into what it called "harassing, annoying and 'bad guy'-identifying chemicals".

The plans were obtained under the US Freedom of Information by the Sunshine Project, a group which monitors research into chemical and biological weapons.

'Who? Me?'

The plan for a so-called "love bomb" envisaged an aphrodisiac chemical that would provoke widespread homosexual behaviour among troops, causing what the military called a "distasteful but completely non-lethal" blow to morale.

Scientists also reportedly considered a "sting me/attack me" chemical weapon to attract swarms of enraged wasps or angry rats towards enemy troops.

A substance to make the skin unbearably sensitive to sunlight was also pondered.

Another idea was to develop a chemical causing "severe and lasting halitosis", so that enemy forces would be obvious even when they tried to blend in with civilians.

In a variation on that idea, researchers pondered a "Who? Me?" bomb, which would simulate flatulence in enemy ranks.

Indeed, a "Who? Me?" device had been under consideration since 1945, the government papers say.

However, researchers concluded that the premise for such a device was fatally flawed because "people in many areas of the world do not find faecal odour offensive, since they smell it on a regular basis".

Captain Dan McSweeney of the Joint Non-Lethal Weapons Directorate at the Pentagon said the defence department receives "literally hundreds" of project ideas, but that "none of the systems described in that [1994] proposal have been developed".

He told the BBC: "It's important to point out that only those proposals which are deemed appropriate, based on stringent human effects, legal, and international treaty reviews are considered for development or acquisition."




Down the Rabbit Hole with President Queeg

A couple of posts back, we see the article where, performers at the inauguration are being warned 1)Not to look at Bush directly, and 2)Not to make sudden moves.

This whole thing is getting crazier and crazier. As if Bush and whatever the hell was stuck on his back during the debates was not enough, it really seems that the Mad Queen, or Captain Queeg, or King George the Cowardly, has really gone off the deep end, and with him, all the security staff.

So, has Resident BUSHY become Medusa or something suddenly, and those who look directly at him may turn to stone? Do people need to carry mirrors, or highly polished shields to get a virtual glance...or, does he NOW think he is indeed royalty, and no commoner must meet his gaze with theirs?

Folks, I told you this nut would get nuttier, way BEFORE the election of 2004.

Now, you have the nut embedded in the White House like a tick under the saddle of a horse....whatcha gonna do when they come knocking at your door to take your personal guns, and brand 666 in your hide?

Winning Souls to Christ in The World of Warcraft

Winning Souls to Christ in The World of WarcraftBilly Houston, a Landover Baptist Senior High youth, has been sharing Jesus in the virtual gaming world for over three years. "I evangelized in Lineage 2, Everquest, Diablo, and a bunch of other games," he says, "but I haven't seen nearly as many people who are as open to hearing the Gospel message as I have inside the World of Warcraft." Billy has what gamers call, a Level 57 Undead Priest with Holy Focus. "I'm also in one of the largest Christian guilds on our server," he says. "I think the reason so many people are open to hearing about Jesus in the World of Warcraft is because the majority of people who play the game are lonely kids who don't have any friends. I doubt any of them play sports so you can pretty much guess that there are lots of gay boys and fat little pale-faced Wiccan girls on the servers who hate themselves and escape into virtual characters so they don't have to deal with their pathetic lives. When they hear that someone loves them, even if it is just the Lord Jesus Christ, they always want to hear more!"

The World of Warcraft is ripe for eager young Christian evangelists to ply their trade. "I'm studying to be a missionary at Liberty University, in Lynchburg, Virginia," says one gamer (who prefers to remain anonymous) and sharing the Good News of Jesus in Azeroth is a great way to practice soulwinning in Arkansas, where I'm from originally. I think that when Jesus said in Mark 16:15, Go ye into all the world and preach the gospel to every creature, He knew that True Christians™ like me in the future, would be called into virtual worlds where we'd be witnessing to gnomes, trolls, night elves and all sorts of other creatures. I also think that verse applies to Christian astronaut missionaries in the future who will encounter and evangelize unsaved alien life forms on other planets. I believe with my whole heart that Christian gamers are sincerely answering the Great Commission of Jesus and we are able to do it without getting out of our chairs or leaving our bedrooms. I bet the Apostle Paul is so jealous!"
===========SNIP===================
note- Landover Baptist is a satire site

Police State Inaguration for King Bush

Police State Inaguration for King BushPolice State Inaguration for King Bush
Unprecedented Security & Cost for Bush's Second Inauguration

The Guardian | January 14, 2005
By Julian Borger

A few square miles of central Washington will be transformed into an armed camp next week as the biggest security operation in the city's history is mounted for President Bush's inauguration.

When Mr Bush and his vice-president, Dick Cheney, are sworn in for the second time on the steps of the Capitol building at midday on Thursday, the US government will be at its most vulnerable. Just about every member of the executive, Congress and the supreme court will be in the same place.

To protect them, 6,000 police officers, 2,500 soldiers and hundreds of secret service officers will flood the area around Capitol Hill and Pennsylvania Avenue, the route of the inaugural parade, scanning the expected 750,000-strong crowd of supporters and protesters.

Air traffic into the city will be restricted, replaced by fighter jets and Black Hawk helicopters.

The outgoing homeland security secretary, Tom Ridge, overseeing the last grand event of his career, promised it would be the most secure ceremony in history.

"We're as prepared as possible to thwart any attempts at terrorism," he said. Troop carrying helicopters have been flying over Washington for days, but the security operation will begin in earnest on Tuesday when fireworks, parades and parties - costing a total of $40m (about £21m) - begin. The government has not yet put a price on the security, but it will cost tens of millions more.

Related:


Ridge describes unprecedented security for Bush swearing-in

Soldiers practice security for Inauguration

Inauguration Shutdown Of Downtown Extensive

Some Now Question Cost of Inauguration

Inauguration to have 6,000 guards

Inauguration prompts unprecedented levels of security

Inauguration security will be the tightest in U.S. history


There have been complaints from both ends of the political spectrum about civil liberty. The secret service has banned anything that could conceal, or be used as, a weapon. That includes poles supporting placards, the coffins some demonstrators had wanted to bring to symbolise the Iraqi war dead, and the crosses and American flags that the faithful had intended to wave.

Kristinn Taylor, the head of the Washington branch of a conservative group Free Republic, disagreed with the ban, for the left and the right:


"If we're allowed to hold our American flags, then they can hold their hammer and sickle flags or whatever."

But others believe the security threat has not been taken seriously enough.

The conservative commentator Norman Ornstein wrote in the New Republic magazine that the inauguration was "the single most vulnerable moment for our constitutional system - far more dangerous than either the conventions or the general election".

Mr Ornstein said a catastrophic terrorist attack on Thursday, such as a nuclear suitcase bomb, would plunge the country into chaos, as no clear contingency plans had been made for the possibility that everyone in the chain of succession was killed at once.

The cost of the event has also provoked controversy.

Washington's mayor, Anthony Williams, has complained that the city will have to spend $17.3m to help pay for security. The federal government normally reimburses the city for such costs, but this year it has told Mr Williams to take most of the money from Washington's homeland security budget, draining its defences for the rest of the year.

Democrats have criticised the $40m celebrations as a tasteless display of excess, saying tradition dictates that wartime inaugurations are restrained affairs. The Republicans' response has been that the whole event is dedicated to US soldiers serving abroad.

The inauguration has been officially subtitled "Celebrating Freedom and Honouring Service". The party also pointed out that the bill would be paid entirely by private contributions.

That sponsorship has, in its turn, attracted scrutiny. Election rules do not allow firms to make direct campaign donations to candidates, and they place strict limits on individual contributions.

These restrictions do not apply to inaugurations, and a host of corporations have lined up to demonstrate their support. They are permitted to give up to $250,000.

Some companies, like the Marriott hotel chain, have got around the nominal $250,000 limit by arranging donations from subsidiary firms. Other big givers include Ford, Exxon Mobil, and the defence contractor Northrop Grumman.

In return, company executives will be given tickets to the ceremony and to the black-tie balls. Political watchdogs are asking what else they will receive once the administration gets down to making policy.

An expensive do

·An estimated $40m (about £21m) will be spent on parties and parades in Washington next week - an inauguration record

·About 250,000 people will watch the swearing-in ceremony, and twice that number will line the parade route. It will take President Bush less than a minute to take the oath

·With security paramount, 6,000 police officers and 2,500 military personnel will protect the guests

·Packages offered to guests include a $1m deal, for which they get four nights in a hotel a stone's throw from the White House, return travel from any city in the US, a chauffeur and a butler on 24-hour call for the duration, his-and-her diamond watches and designer outfits, spa treatment and monogrammed bathrobes

·An exclusive lunch with Mr Bush and the vice president, Dick Cheney, and two tables for 19 friends at an eve-of inauguration banquet is not cheap either, at $250,000



Inauguration Shutdown Of Downtown Extensive

Washington Post | January 12, 2005
By Spencer S. Hsu and Sari Horwitz

Federal officials announced plans yesterday to close roughly 100 square blocks of downtown Washington to vehicles on Inauguration Day and to restrict traffic on another 100 square blocks.

Motorists should prepare for detours and delays even before President Bush is sworn in for a second term Jan. 20. Some streets will be closed Sunday for a dress rehearsal of the inaugural parade. Others will be closed from time to time starting Tuesday as Bush and other dignitaries head to concerts, receptions and other events.

Pennsylvania Avenue NW -- the parade route -- will be closed after 6 p.m. Jan. 19 for security, as workers remove streetlights and weld shut manhole covers, D.C. police said.

Bush is to take the oath of office in a noontime ceremony at the Capitol on Jan. 20. Throughout the day and into the night, much of downtown will be off-limits to motorists. The restrictions cover Second Street east of the Capitol to 23rd Street to the west, extending roughly between E Street south of the Capitol and K Street to the north, plus an area around the Washington Convention Center.

Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge acknowledged yesterday that security plans go well beyond those undertaken in 2001 for Bush's first inauguration. This is the widest planned shutdown of the core business district in memory, and Ridge said authorities intend to be "as prepared as possible."

"You can well imagine that the security for this occasion will be unprecedented," said Ridge, who gave an overview of plans in a briefing near the Capitol. "Our goal is that any attempt on the part of anyone or any group to disrupt the inaugural will be repelled by multiple layers of security."

For the first inauguration after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, officials plan to deploy 6,000 law enforcement officers and 7,000 U.S. troops. Roughly 60 federal, state and local agencies will handle security, led by the U.S. Secret Service.

Ridge's announcement came amid criticism from D.C. Mayor Anthony A. Williams (D) that the federal government was forcing the District to divert $11.9 million from homeland security projects to pay for the inauguration. Williams was scheduled to appear with Ridge yesterday but did not; aides said he was ill.

Ridge said the department had approved the District's use of homeland security grants intended for contingencies, such as police overtime when the national terror alert level is raised. Aides added that the District has received $240 million in homeland security aid over three years and that many federal assets were also being used this month.

Asked how much the federal government was paying for inauguration security, Ridge said: "It's in the millions, and I don't know how many millions. . . . We haven't calculated it yet."

To illustrate the magnitude of the undertaking, he and other Homeland Security officials literally assembled a dog-and-pony show for yesterday's briefing.

Ridge not only was surrounded by federal law enforcement, members of the military and local police chiefs, but he also was flanked by explosives-sniffing dog teams from the Army and by U.S. Park Police officers on horseback. Also on display: mobile command centers belonging to the Secret Service, the Federal Protective Service, the joint military command for Washington, the D.C. Emergency Management Agency and others.

Combat-ready troops with the 3rd Infantry Regiment showed off M-4 assault rifles and night-vision goggles, joining troops with a Marine Corps rapid chemical and biological agent reaction force and the Military District of Washington engineering company specializing in rescues from collapsed buildings.

Ridge acknowledged that U.S. authorities have received no information for several weeks to even consider raising the national terror threat level. Last spring, authorities predicted a high "election-year threat" continuing through the inauguration.

"There is no specific threat directed toward the inaugural or the inaugural activities," Ridge said. "But the fact that . . . the decibel level is down doesn't really mean that we would ever be less vigilant. . . . This is the most visible manifestation of our democracy."

Later, Secret Service officials announced the first details of the many restrictions to take effect.

The list of items prohibited from all event sites includes weapons of any kind, aerosols, supports for signs and placards, packages, coolers, thermal or glass containers, backpacks, laser pointers, bags larger than 8 inches by 6 inches by 4 inches and "any other items determined to be a potential safety hazard," the Secret Service said.

A dozen public entry points have been set for the tens of thousands of people who will be coming downtown for the parade, mostly within two blocks of the parade route, to open at 9 a.m. Jan. 20.

Some restrictions already are drawing complaints. The Christian Defense Coalition, a Washington-based advocacy group, protested a ban on carrying crosses that could be used as weapons.

D.C. police announced the limits on vehicle traffic. All vehicles will be barred from a security zone starting late Wednesday, "no ifs, ands or buts," D.C. police Capt. Jeff Herold said. Hotel and office building garages will be inspected and shut inside the zone, which includes the area around the White House to the Capitol, plus around the Convention Center.

Most street parking will be barred from wider vehicle-restricted zones, and only people who can show they live or have legitimate "business that you can articulate" inside will be permitted to drive in, Herold said.

Authorities urged people to walk or use Metro on Inauguration Day. Limits will be relaxed in phases as Inauguration Day proceeds.

"We realize it is an inconvenience for one day, one partial day, even. We really hope everyone can wrap their arms around it and deal with the event as it is, and help us keep it as safe as possible for every citizen, business, attendee and demonstrator," Herold said.

Inauguration to have 6,000 guards
Unprecedented security to include larger no-fly zone

CNN | January 12, 2005

There will be several thousand police officers from several jurisdictions on duty during the inauguration.

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Security for President Bush's inauguration -- the first swearing-in since the September 11, 2001, attacks -- will be unprecedented with some 6,000 law enforcement personnel, canine bomb teams and close monitoring of transportation.

In describing the plans for the January 20 event, Department of Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge said that while the decibel level was down on terrorism chatter, the 55th quadrennial presidential inauguration was such a high-profile event that security would be at its highest level.

"This is the most visible manifestation of our democracy," Ridge said at a news conference near the Capitol, where Bush will take the oath on the West Front.

Ridge detailed some of the security plans, including patrols of harbors, mobile command vehicles, round-the-clock surveillance of the key facilities, a record number of canine bomb teams and thousands of security personnel. He likened the resources to those used during the political conventions last year.

"Security will be at the highest levels of any inauguration," Ridge said.

The Federal Aviation Administration has announced that it will expand the no-fly zone, now a 15-3/4-mile radius around the Washington Monument, to a 23-mile radius around Reagan National, Dulles and Baltimore-Washington International airports. The temporary flight restrictions will be in effect from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m. on January 20.

Roughly 2,500 military personnel will also be on hand to bolster security, with another 4,700 involved in ceremonial duties, said Maj. Gen. Galen Jackman, who commands the Army's military district of Washington.

Jackman said he did not think all the security would detract from the experience of the 250,000 people expected to watch the swearing-in and the estimated 500,000 expected along the parade route from the Capitol to the White House.

"I don't think people will notice kind of an encampment mentality here," Jackman said. "I think they'll feel very comfortable with what we've arranged."

Ridge noted that intelligence picked up in March and April suggested terrorists may be interested in attacking during the election year. He and other counterterrorism officials have said that threat could extend through the inauguration.

On Tuesday, he sought to play down the warnings issued last year. "There is no specific threat directed toward the inaugural or inaugural activities," he said.

City officials in Washington are still working with the Homeland Security Department to sort out who will pay some of the bills. The district's total cost for the event is expected to be $17.3 million, which includes overtime for members of the more than 60 law enforcement agencies that will be brought in to help.

Among other charges: almost $3 million to build viewing stands and $43,260 to develop special license tags, according to a letter Washington Mayor Anthony Williams sent to federal officials late last month.

City officials are seeking permission to dip into the district's $240 million allotment from the federal government to pay for other costs it will incur during the inauguration.

When asked if he thought it was appropriate to use city dollars for basics such as bleachers, Ridge said he was not aware of city money going toward infrastructure improvements, but said the district is eligible for federal reimbursement for overtime expenses.

"We believe there are significant resources available to help the district with costs associated with increased security," Homeland Security spokesman Brian Roehrkasse said.

Inauguration prompts unprecedented levels of security

The Orlando Sentinel | January 15, 2005
BY TAMARA LYTLE

WASHINGTON -(KRT) - President Bush's second inauguration will draw unprecedented wartime security, from airspace closed to all but government aircraft to screening everyone, even parade-goers, Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge promised Tuesday.

While the inauguration marks the first such gathering in the nation's capital since the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, Ridge said intelligence forces have picked up no specific threats aimed at such a tempting symbol of American democracy.

"We wanted to ... assure all of you that the local, state and federal government is as prepared as possible to thwart any attempts at disruption of this celebration of democracy," Ridge said in a news conference on the National Mall.

He was surrounded by troops with night-vision goggles, chemical-response teams showing off their gas masks and a half-dozen bomb-sniffing dogs - all, Ridge said, aimed "to thwart terrorists and to protect the hallmark of our democratic and constitutional traditions."

When Bush raises his hand to take the oath on Jan. 20, members of Cabinet, Congress and the Supreme Court, foreign dignitaries and 250,000 other people will be gathered on the West Front of the Capitol. Another half-million will be waiting along the Pennsylvania Avenue parade route.

About, 6,000 police from all over the country as well as federal agencies will fan out over the inaugural sites. Florida Highway Patrol will send a contingent on its first-ever security mission outside the state, said Lt. John Bagnardi, who will lead the group.

"It's nice to be involved in something of this magnitude - to showcase your agency in front of the world and to be exposed to this type of security on such a large scale," Bagnardi said.

Florida troopers get lots of opportunities to work with Secret Service when the president or presidential candidates come to the state because of the state's political stature.

But, he said, one thing they're not quite prepared for is the bitter weather expected in Washington. "Our uniforms are not that conducive to that hard, cold weather," he said, noting Highway Patrol had ordered uniform sweaters and plan to pack long johns.

Ridge said that intercepted intelligence information last year indicated a potential terrorist attack during the election year. But now "the decibel level is down," so the nation's security threat rating will not be changed. Still, he said, this inauguration will have unprecedented security.

Some of the measures include: monitoring ventilation systems of hotels, keeping 24-hour surveillance of all facilities involved in the festivities, using portable x-ray machines to check delivery trucks and even requiring parade-watchers to go through security checkpoints.

As Ridge spoke Tuesday, a convoy of recreational vehicles was parked behind him - each one a mobile command center for a different agency.

Charles Ramsey, chief of police for the District of Columbia, said his agency was ready for protesters, although they don't know how many to expect. "I know we'll have a few. We'll handle it."

The military will have 2,500 troops working on security and another 4,700 performing ceremonial roles and ready to jump in if there is an emergency, said Army Maj. Gen. Galen Jackman, who commands the military district here and will escort Bush down the East Front of the Capitol to review the military units before the parade.

"I don't think people will notice an encampment mentality," he said, noting many of the security measures will be invisible.

Jackman said that although the security is tighter than any previous inauguration, it is comparable to recent events such as the Republican and Democratic national conventions and the funeral for former President Ronald Reagan.

Jackman said the inaugural crowd will be smaller than the May gathering for the dedication of the World War II Memorial.

The Reagan funeral included a security scare that caused a panicked evacuation of the Capitol when the military became alarmed by an unknown airplane approaching Washington. The plane, carrying Kentucky Gov. Ernie Fletcher, turned out to be traveling legitimately but with a broken transponder.

William Shumann, spokesman for the Federal Aviation Administration, said the FAA knew Fletcher's plane was not a threat, but a lack of communication between the FAA and the military led to the misunderstanding.

That won't happen again, he said.

In addition to the usual no-fly zone that extends nearly 16 miles in every direction from the Washington Monument, the FAA on Inauguration Day will enforce a separate ban on private aircraft within 23 miles of the three major airports in the region - Reagan National, Dulles International and Baltimore-Washington International. And exemptions for elected officials will be canceled that day.

Private donors pay the tab for the $40 million in balls and other festivities. But the security costs fall to the government.

Washington Mayor Anthony Williams has complained that his city is not getting enough help with its $17.3 million in costs.

Ridge said he's not sure how many millions all the security will cost.

"It is the greatest manifestation as to who we are and what we stand for in our country," he said. "And whatever we need to do to ensure the safety of the participants and the citizens of the city around the inaugural, we will do."

Unprecedented security planned for Bush's inauguration next week

Canadian Press | January 14, 2005
By BETH GORHAM

WASHINGTON - With coast guard boats patrolling the Potomac and bomb-sniffing dogs roaming the crowds, security at next week's inauguration of President George W. Bush will be the tightest in U.S. history.

There will be about 6,000 police, mobile command vehicles and portable X-ray units, with extra manpower scouring downtown hotels and transportation areas under an expanded no-fly zone around the capital during the Jan. 20 event, Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge said Tuesday.

While there's been "no specific threat" from terrorists to stage an attack during the 55th inaugural events, "this is the most visible manifestation of our democracy," he said.

"Security will be at the highest level of any inauguration."

Ridge and other officials warned last year of terrorist threats to disrupt events during the U.S. electoral season, prompting accusations from critics that they were trying to bolster support for Bush.

"The decibel level is down" on intelligence chatter about potential strikes that reached a high point last spring, said Ridge.

About 2,500 military personnel are also expected to help secure events next Thursday, including the official swearing-in and a parade from the Capitol to the White House that's likely to attract an estimated 500,000 people.

The gala day is costing $40 million US before security costs are factored in.

Not everyone will be celebrating, however.

Several organizations that opposed Bush's re-election plan marches and rallies designed to disrupt the inauguration.

"Americans of conscience must shun any president who so arrogantly shuns democracy, civil rights, the environment and the poor," said Morrigan Phillips of the DC Resistance Media Collective.

Officials held a dress rehearsal Sunday for the big event to ensure that the timing of music and speeches would lead to Bush's swearing-in at noon as scheduled.

The ceremony will take place on the Capitol's west terrace, where it's been held since former president Ronald Reagan in 1981.

Soldiers practice security for Inauguration

Army News Service | January 12, 2005
By Spc. Justin Nieto

WASHINGTON (Army News Service, Jan. 12, 2005) -- Elements of the Joint Forces Headquarters-National Capital Region gathered at the National Mall in Washington, D.C., Jan. 11 to participate in a public demonstration of some of the biggest and best tools being used for security in the upcoming Inauguration.

Among those present for the event were Charles H. Ramsey, chief of the Metropolitan Police Department, Tom Ridge, secretary of Homeland Security and Maj. Gen. Galen B. Jackman, commander of the JFHQ-NCR.

Lining the street in front of the Capitol were various mobile command centers, booms raised, doors opened and personnel ready for a brief tour by the senior officials.

On the Mall itself were representatives of the various security and ceremonial agencies, including Soldiers from the Military District of Washington, members of the Metropolitan Police Department and Marines from the Chemical-Biological Incident Response Force stationed at Indian Head, Md.

“It’s important to note that the people and the organizations represented here in person and with this equipment have been working together for years and years,” said Ridge during the press conference following the demonstration. “They work together all the time on all the events in the National Capital Region.

“These organizations represent what the Department of Homeland Security tries to do nationally,” said Ridge: “Integrate capacities, abilities and all jurisdictions, because together, they are an extremely strong force.”

Ridge said the reason for the display was to assure public that all the levels of government are ready and prepared to deter and defend against any threat to the inaugural events.

“These resources will cover all aspects of the Inauguration, including the oath of office, the parade and any inaugural balls,” said Ridge. As many as 6,000 police officers from different agencies will be present, augmented by Homeland Security personnel, Ridge added.

Among those joining the police and other security personnel in defense of the inaugural events are the troops of the JFHQ-NCR.

“We have a Joint Task Force within the National Capital Region, which is responsible for providing support to a lead federal agency,” said Jackman, who commands the task force as well as the Military District of Washington and the Joint Task Force, Armed Forces Inaugural Committee, which coordinates the military support “on the ceremonial side … like for the swearing-in ceremony and the parade.”

Jackman went on to outline some of the security measures his commands are responsible for during this event.

“We coordinate all of the air defense for the air space around the National Capital Region, we coordinate the maritime security on the Potomac and Anacostia rivers, and the Washington Channel,” Jackman said. “In support of the Secret Service,” he add, “we’re providing significant medical capability, robust explosive ordinance disposal and detection capabilities.

“Also, we provide a special technical rescue ability for collapsed structures and then, stationed a little bit further away from the Metropolitan area, we have forces that are stationed to respond,” said Jackman.

Jackman also fielded questions about his organization’s readiness and planning.

“We’ve worked just about every threat tendency that we could think of here,” said Jackman. “We worked through all of the ‘What ifs’ -- how we would respond, how we would work with the agencies and this team together in what we call ‘tabletop exercises’.

“We’re very confident in our preparations for this event,” Jackman said.

Inauguration Performers Ordered NOT to look directly at Bush

Inauguration Performers Ordered NOT to look directly at Bush
Inauguration Performers Ordered NOT to look directly at Bush

Scripps Howard | January 11, 2005
By Joan Lowy

WASHINGTON - The nation's 55th presidential inauguration, the first to be held since 9/11, will take place this month under perhaps the heaviest security of any in U.S. history.

Dozens of federal and local law enforcement agencies and military commands are planning what they describe as the heaviest possible security. Virtually everyone who gets within eyesight of the president either during the Jan. 20 inauguration ceremony at the U.S. Capitol or the inaugural parade down Pennsylvania Avenue later in the day will first go through a metal detector or receive a body pat-down.

Thousands of police officers and military personnel are being brought to Washington from around the country for the four-day event. Sharpshooters will be deployed on roofs, while bomb-sniffing dogs will work the streets. Electronic sensors will be used to detect chemical or biological weapons.

Anti-abortion protesters have been warned to leave their crosses at home. Parade performers will have security escorts to the bathroom, and they've been ordered not to look directly at President Bush or make any sudden movements while passing the reviewing stand.

"It's going to be very different from past inaugurals," said Contricia Sellers-Ford, spokeswoman for the U.S. Capitol Police, which is responsible for the Capitol and grounds. "A lot of the security differences will not be detected by the public - there will be a lot of behind the scenes implementation - but the public will definitely see more of a police presence."

The Department of Homeland Security has designated the inaugural a National Special Security Event under a protocol introduced by President Bill Clinton that calls for especially heavy security during events of national significance at which large numbers of government officials and dignitaries are present.

There have been 20 previously designated special security events, including Bush's first inaugural, last year's Democratic and Republican conventions, former President Ronald Reagan's funeral and the 2002 Super Bowl.

Under the protocol, the Secret Service takes the lead in drawing up the security plan, while the FBI gathers intelligence and the Federal Emergency Management Agency oversees response scenarios to possible terror attacks.

The Secret Service also works closely with the Defense Department, the National Park Service, and local police agencies, especially the Washington police department and the Capitol police. About 40 agencies are involved.

The Joint Force Headquarters National Capital Region, which was created two years ago to bring coordination to the many disparate military units in the Washington area, will provide more than 4,000 troops to help.

Washington, D.C., police chief Charles Ramsey has sent invitations to police departments across the country inviting them to send squads of officers to help with inauguration security. The federal government is paying for officers' hotels, meals and air travel.

Several thousand officers are expected, Ramsey said. That includes squads from the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department, Seattle, Minneapolis, Chicago, Bradenton, Fla., Charlotte and Greensboro, N.C., the North Carolina state highway patrol, several law enforcement agencies in Texas and other parts of the country.

"This is the first post 9/11 (inauguration) so obviously there are some more security concerns this time than in past years," Ramsey said.

The extra officers from around the country will free up Washington police officers so that they can form "mobile platoon civil disturbance units" to prevent protest demonstrations from getting out of hand, Ramsey said.

Groups planning demonstrations during the inauguration festivities are already smarting from security restrictions. Anti-war protesters with the A.N.S.W.E.R Coalition have complained that large sections of the parade route have been set aside for Bush's political contributors and supporters and will be closed to the general public.

The anti-abortion Christian Defense Coalition, which is also planning a demonstration, has threatened to sue the government because the Secret Service recently added crosses to its list of objects that are banned from the parade route.

"I think it's censorship no matter how you look at it," said the Rev. Patrick Mahoney, director of the defense coalition.

Besides weapons, other items on the banned list include coolers, folding chairs, bicycles, pets, papier-mache objects, displays such as puppets, mock coffins, props and "any items determined to be a potential safety hazard."

Parade performers said they also have been warned to expect unprecedented security.
"They've told us right out that it's going to be very, very tight," said Peter LaFlamme, executive director of the Spartans Drum and Bugle Corps in Nashua, N.H. LaFlamme said he has been receiving almost daily phone calls from inaugural organizers to apprise him of new security procedures.

Thousands of performers - marching bands, color guards, pompon dancers, hand bell-ringers, drill teams on horseback and Civil War re-enactors - will be bused early in the morning to the Pentagon parking lot across the Potomac in Virginia. While performers disembark and go through metal detectors, bomb-sniffing dogs will search the buses.
Then everybody will get back on the buses for a trip to the National Mall, where they will spend most of the day in heavily guarded warming tents. Participants have been warned that they will not be allowed to leave the tents except to go to portable toilets accompanied by a security escort.

Other instructions given performers include a warning not to look directly at Bush while passing the presidential reviewing stand, not to look to either side and not to make any sudden movements.

"They want you to just look straight ahead," said Danielle Adam, co-director of the Mid American Pompon All Star Team from Michigan, which also performed in the 2001 inaugural parade.

"Last time we went security was really tight," Adam said. "This time we got almost like a book of things we needed to fill out beforehand."

Anti-Inauguration Action and Protest in San Antonio, Thurs. Jan. 20

Anti-Inauguration Action and Protest in San Antonio, Thurs. Jan. 20

Join in the funeral procession to mourn the death of democracy, peace, tolerance, civil liberties, and the thousands of people who have died due to the policies of the Bush Administration.

10,000 Jesuses

10,000 JesusesWe're looking for a few good Jesuses. Men or women who are willing to wear a robe, grow a little hair and travel to Washington D.C. for the Presidential Inauguration on January 20th.

AlterNet: War on Iraq: The Meaning of One Thousand

AlterNet: War on Iraq: The Meaning of One ThousandThe Meaning of One Thousand

By Tai Moses, AlterNet. Posted September 10, 2004.


A thousand U.S. soldiers dead and a thousand candles at a vigil. Our anguish should not be our only response. Story Tools
EMAIL
PRINT
BUY
ALSO IN WAR ON IRAQ

An Appeal to Global Conscience


Rethinking Iraq: A Debate Among Progressives


Twin Golems of Violence
Mark LeVine

Lakshmi Chaudhry


Tom Hayden


Jonathan Schell



More stories by Tai Moses


We were participating in that most ancient of human rituals – communal mourning. Strangers sharing the lighting of candles and mingling of flames, our thoughts unified by a single theme: grief for the dead and longing for peace.

Like thousands of other Americans around the country, I was at a candlelight vigil Thursday evening to remember the more than 1,000 U.S. service members killed in Iraq and the tens of thousands of Iraqi dead. Coordinated by MoveOn.org, Win Without War, Military Families Speak Out and other groups, the vigils took place in 900 cities and drew upwards of 40,000 people.

Nearly 250 people from neighborhoods around Lake Merritt, in Oakland, Calif., gathered at the colonnade on the edge of the lake to stand quietly, candles in hand. A few held placards reading "1,000 Dead," "Quagmire," or "No End In Sight." Some were still in work clothes; other came in exercise outfits. An organizer made a brief announcement at the start of the vigil and again halfway through, but other than that, there were no speeches, only whispering and then silence.

onethousandcoffins.org

onethousandcoffins.orgPlease join us in Washington on Thursday, January 20. We will install over 1,363 flag-draped coffins to protest the inaugural. Contact One Thousand Coffins or Iraq War Memorial for more information.

Visit Hostelling International DC for low-cost housing. The Chinatown Bus leaves from 88 East Broadway in NYC at 7am and 8 am. The roundtrip cost is $35. One-way is $20. The trip takes 4 to 5 hours

The Obscenity of the Second Infection Inauguration

Well...thanks to dead people voting, the help of Diebold, throwing away of many Democrative votes and not counting them, BUSHY is set to be the RESIDENT of the White House again.

And boy oh boy, does he want to rub the collective nose of the nation in it!

See this page...
http://www.inaugural05.com/

In a country with people going to bed hungry, when old people have to decide between their medications and FOOD, this ostentatious (or should I say, AUSTINTATIOUS) display is really, a new definition of an obscene use of money.

God Help Us.

Want a REAL conservative viewpoint?
Check http://www.infowars.com

Fatcat Inaugural Contributors Have a Lot to Gain

By THOMAS HARGROVE
Jan 14, 2005, 07:38


Many of President Bush's largest corporate contributors to this month's $40 million inaugural bash are also some of the nation's biggest government contractors, getting at least $2.9 billion from Uncle Sam last year.
Forty-four corporations, groups and individuals have each pledged $250,000 - the maximum under voluntary guidelines set by the White House - to defray costs for the most expensive inauguration ever held for a second-term president.

At least five are corporations that got $286 million or more in federal contracts last year, according to a Scripps Howard News Service study of the Federal Procurement Data System computer files maintained by the Office of Management and Budget.

"This is something the public ought to be looking at. It's a giant loophole because it's a way for special interests to maximize their clout with the administration," said Steven Weiss of the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics. "They are hoping to extend their influence."

Other contributing firms have important legislative or regulatory issues pending before Congress or the White House this year.

"When we look at the list of donors, we see a number of companies that have pending business, shall we say, before the administration," said James Benton, a research analyst for Common Cause, a nonpartisan public interest lobbying group. "The corporations will say it's all about being a good corporate citizen. But it's also about getting access and influence."

The largest federal contractor to give to the president's inaugural is United Technologies Corp., which last year had active federal contracts worth $1.2 billion. The company produces Pratt & Whitney F119 jet engines used in the F-22 Advanced Tactical Fighter, although exactly how many of these $350 million aircraft will be built is still under debate by Pentagon policymakers.

A spokesman said United Technologies wanted to show "strong support for a national tradition" through its donation.

"Presidential inaugurations transcend partisan politics," said spokesman Scott Seligman from the company's Washington office. "We're delighted to do our part in a tangible way that helps make public tickets to inaugural events more affordable for everyone."

Other top contractors who have given the maximum allowable to Bush's inaugural include Exxon-Mobil Corp., which signed a single deal worth $390 million to provide petroleum products for the Defense Logistics Agency. Exxon had 120 contracts totaling at least $649 million for a variety of goods and services.

There were other energy-related donors that gave the maximum allowed, including Texas oilman Boone Pickens, former Enron president Richard Kinder who now runs the natural gas company and utility giant Southern Co.

Also giving $250,000 for the inauguration were AT&T, which had contracts worth $366 million, Michael Dell of Dell Computer with federal sales of $362 million and Ford Motor Co. with government sales of $286 million.

Critics said special interest groups have other motivations for currying the White House's favor besides federal contracts. "Many of these groups are regulated industries that clearly want to influence how the government regulates them," Weiss said.

Petroleum and electric companies will want to influence the national energy bill still pending in Congress, while financial institutions like Bank of America will be impacted by Bush's proposal to privatize part of the Social Security Administration's funds and to create tougher bankruptcy laws.

"There are reasons to be concerned by all of this," Benton said. "These people aren't giving money from the bottom of their hearts. The bottom line is they want something, some kind of consideration."

The individuals and groups giving to the inauguration are considerably less Texas-oriented than was the case for Bush's political and inaugural fundraising four years ago. This year, 21 donors from California gave $3.2 million, followed by 15 donors from the District of Columbia who gave $2.4 million. Texans come in third with 12 donations worth $1.6 million, followed by nine New Yorkers worth $1.2 million.

The donor report issued this week by the president's inaugural committee totals $17.8 million, well below the $40 million goal. Bush faced a similar problem four years ago when donations were slow for the $40 million target he set then, as well.

Bush's 2001 inaugural committee solved the shortfall by offering special "underwriter packages" of inaugural tickets for groups that contributed at least $100,000.


On the Net: www.inaugural05.com

Big Brother is Alive, Well and Watching Your Travel Habits

Capitol Hill Blue: Big Brother is Alive, Well and Watching Your Travel Habits
Big Brother is Alive, Well and Watching Your Travel Habits
By Staff and Wire Reports
Jan 15, 2005, 10:40
Email this article
Printer friendly page

If you're among the millions of Americans who took airline flights in the months before the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, the FBI probably knows about it - and possibly where you stayed, whom you traveled with, what credit card you used and even whether you ordered a kosher meal.
The bureau is keeping 257.5 million records on people who flew on commercial airlines from June through September 2001 in its permanent investigative database, according to information obtained by a privacy group and made available to The Associated Press.

Privacy advocates say they're troubled by the possibility that the FBI could be analyzing personal information about people without their knowledge or permission.

"The FBI collected a vast amount of information about millions of people with no indication that they had done anything unlawful," said Marcia Hofmann, attorney with the Electronic Privacy Information Center, which learned about the data through a Freedom of Information Act request.

"The fact that they're hanging on to the information is inexcusable," Hofmann said on Friday.

FBI spokesman Bill Carter said the bureau was required to retain its records.

"There are rules that have been set by the National Archives with regard to the retention of records by government agencies," Carter said.

Hofmann, though, said the FBI still had a legal responsibility to tell people that it had obtained information about them and to let them have access to it.

As part of its investigation into the terrorist attacks, the FBI asked for, and got, the records from a number of airlines shortly after Sept. 11. The FBI also got one set of data through a federal grand jury subpoena.

The privacy center in May requested records of the FBI's acquisition of the data. The bureau last week turned over 12 pages of information, much of it blanked out for security reasons.

The 12 pages do show that the bureau obtained 82.1 million passenger manifests, or lists of people who flew on planes, between January and September 2001, in addition to the 257.5 million passenger name records.

Citing privacy concerns, the FBI didn't reveal which airlines turned over the information, which airline employees turned it over and which FBI special agents got it.

The data are called passenger name records, or PNR, and can include a variety of information such as credit card numbers, travel itineraries, addresses, telephone numbers and meal requests.

David Hardy, the FBI's chief of the record/information dissemination section of the records management division, said in a legal document dated Jan. 5 that the data were being stored and combined with other information from the Sept. 11 investigation, dubbed PENTTBOMB.

"I have been advised that the Airline Data Sets have been entered by the Cyber Division into a 'Data Warehouse' and have been intertwined for analytical purposes with the information from several other PENTTBOMB Data Sets," Hardy wrote in a statement to the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, where the privacy center filed its suit.

Hofmann, the attorney for the privacy group, said the FBI had a legitimate reason for collecting information to get a better picture of the hijackers' travel patterns and possible associates.

But, she said, "it wouldn't seem that there's any reason to keep that information now."

The FBI's Carter said he couldn't comment on what may be happening to the data because the bureau is involved in a lawsuit by the privacy center.

Daniel Solove, a George Washington University Law School professor and author of a book on privacy, said not enough is known about what the FBI is doing with the data to determine if there is a problem.

"Data just sits around and who knows what people are doing with it?" Solove said. "The public is left completely out of the loop, not told what this data is for. The agency is basically saying 'Trust us.'"

Solove suggested there was irony in Congress last year ordering the FBI to more quickly purge information obtained in background checks of gun buyers. That, he said, can be useful in tracking down criminals.

"Congress wants to protect guns at great cost, but when it comes to privacy and civil liberties generally, it doesn't register on the same level," Solove said

Bushism Video - OB-GYNs Kept From Practicing Their Love

"Bushism Video - OB-GYNs Kept From Practicing Their Love
Video Page

From Daniel Kurtzman,

Bushism Video - "OB-GYNs Kept From Practicing Their Love"
http://politicalhumor.about.com/od/bushvideos/v/bushismobgyn.htm
(CLICK ON LINK TO VIDEO)

Here's another link to this video
http://www.independent-media.tv/images/story/obgyn.wmv

2004: Business year in review

"By Martin Webber
BBC World Business Report editor

The economy took a backseat to security as the US went to the polls

For much of 2004, the world has looked on as the US dollar dropped in value against the euro and the pound.

In the first of a two-part review of the year, World Business Report asks if the greenback's days as the top global currency are numbered?

In the world's biggest economy, most attention centred on the fiercely fought Presidential election.

The re-election of George Bush for four more years meant no radical shift of economic priorities for companies and markets to cope with.

But what was highly unusual about this US Presidential race was that the economy failed to top voters' concerns. Three years after the attacks on the World Trade Center, it was security that loomed largest in voters minds.

In any case, some of Americans' fears about the US economy did ease during the past year. At the start of 2004, the US revival had been dubbed the "jobless recovery", but - as the year wore on - job creation did accelerate, even if many of the new jobs were part time.

Fading currency

However, as economic concerns took a backseat inside America, outside the country it was a different story.

Some economists are predicting the dollar will fall further

Concern about where the US economy was heading led to a sharp fall in the value of the dollar, heralding suggestions that the dollar is on the way out as the global top currency.

The last century saw the demise of gold as the world's key store of value. It was replaced by the dollar as the asset most central banks around the world wanted to hold.

But since April this year, the dollar has slid by 12% against the euro and by 10% against the pound.

Not surprisingly, tourists around the globe are now regularly being asked for payment in euros rather than dollars."
===============SNIP======================
HOLY COW BATMAN....Wait, Bushy says the economy is doing great....
and said that last year...how can this be?

HE WOULDN'T LIE TO US WOULD HE?

GROUP WANTS ECONOMIC BOYCOTT ON INAUGURATION DAY

Groups nationwide are discussing staging a one-day economic boycott to protest President Bush`s inauguration. Organizer and writer David Livingstone says if people don`t work or buy things, companies lose money that can`t be taxed to fund the war and programs people don`t support. Livingstone admits a boycott probably won`t have much economic impact, but he says it might get the President`s attention.

Start making your plans for Inauguration Day

"“Intelligence gathered by this and other governments leaves no doubt that the Iraq regime continues to possess and conceal some of the most lethal weapons ever devised.” — George W. Bush, State of the Union Address, Jan. 28, 2003

On Wednesday, Jan. 12, the White House officially announced that, after an extensive investigation, there were never any weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.

On the third Thursday of each month, I usually spend a couple of hours with some friends of mine over dinner. We catch up on recent events, talk about our college days, and enjoy each other’s company. We meet at a local restaurant, and wind up spending $15 or $20 each on food and drink.

But this Thursday will be different. This Thursday will be Jan. 20. On that day, King George II will go through the ceremonies of state that mark the beginning of his second, and thankfully last, term of office. There will be millions spent in Washington on food and drink, on overpriced hotel rooms, first-class plane tickets, champagne and caviar, tuxes and wear-once dresses. Millions will be spent to strut the stuff of power. It will be a veritable orgy of the rich and powerful in Republican America, a day to see and be seen in Washington.

The inauguration will be a stark contrast to the plight of many Americans. There is a growing divide between the wealthy and the poor. More people are working unskilled, non-union jobs to make ends meet, to clothe their kids and fend off bill collectors. Record numbers of people are turning to bankruptcy for a fresh start.

Many young men and women serve in the military and National Guard, enticed by a steady paycheck and educational benefits. Most volunteered with pride and a sense of patriotic duty. Instead, they’ve inherited two and three long tours of duty in unfriendly foreign territory. Twelve hundred of them have inherited a casket.

The situation is even worse in Iraq. Already oppressed by a ruthless dictator, their situation has gone from bad to worse. The economy was reduced to shambles, homes and businesses destroyed by senseless American attacks. Families are subject to midnight raids in search of “insurgents,” meaning anyone who resists the Western occupation. Al Qaeda never had a foothold before, but more Iraqis are viewing resistance as their best chance for peace.

Economic stability, after all, is the bedrock of peace. Islamic fundamentalism prospered among poor young Arabs who felt they had no hope for the future. The Soviet Union fell because of empty shelves and long lines. A bad economy cost Jimmy Carter his second term in 1980, and a good economy assured two terms for Bill Clinton. In Iraq, the people have seen their businesses and a hundred thousand friends and relatives disappear. They do not see a bright future, certainly not like George Bush will envision on Jan. 20.

So, there is a grassroots national campaign underway for an economic boycott in America on Jan. 20. Those who oppose what is happening in Iraq will just not spend any money on that day. No gasoline, no groceries, no home closings.

In a way, we’re empathizing with the Iraqi people who are victims of George Bush’s war. We’re also empathizing with the American families whose sons and daughters are no longer part of our economy. We’ll be expressing our frustration over an administration racking up record deficits that will haunt future generations of Americans.

Will this project hurt the economy? Nope. Buy your groceries on the 19th instead of the 20th. Wait until Friday to go out to eat. At best, it will be a blip on the radar screen, but that’s fine. It’s a chance to vote with your pocketbooks for one day, to make others sit up and think about the impact that economic stagnation can have.

Instead of standing in line like cattle to buy Chinese imported goods, let it be known that you’re not happy with our trade deficit.

Instead of sitting in line to fill your gas tank, let it be known that you’re sick of paying the Arabs for imported oil.

Instead of buying that big-ticket item on Thursday, remember that many people, here and in Iraq, cannot afford the luxuries we take for granted.

There’s no rally to attend, no marching, no registration, no pickets, no public embarrassment. Simply resolve to spend nothing, as many families and many soldiers have no choice but to do.

Not one dime. "
==========================SNIP===============================
AMEN...RIGHT ON...I'M DOING IT!

In first inauguration, Bush Limo Pelted with EGGS

"FAHRENHEIT 9/11: “On the day George W. Bush was inaugurated, tens of thousands of Americans poured into the streets of D.C. They pelted Bush’s limo with eggs.”

“Shouting slogans like ‘Hail to the Thief’ and ‘Selected, Not Elected,’ tens of thousands of protesters descended on George W. Bush's inaugural parade route yesterday to proclaim that he and Vice President Dick Cheney had ‘stolen’ the election.” Michael Kranish and Sue Kirchhoff, “Thousands Protest ‘Stolen’ Election,” Boston Globe, January 21, 2001.
“Scuffles erupted between radicals and riot police while an egg struck the bullet-proof presidential limousine as it carried Mr. Bush and wife Laura to the White House.” Damon Johnston, “Bush Pledges Justice as Critics Throw Eggs,” The Advertisers, January 22, 2001."
==================SNIP=================
No major media showed this. The ONLY place we saw this documentary film footage was in the Michael Moore film . How about it CNN...when the demonstrations begin, have you got the GUTS to show how people REALLY feel about King George the Cowardly?

Bush says he is confused (We agree BUSHY!)

"On the election Bush said he was puzzled that he received only about 11 percent of the black vote, according to exit polls, about a 2 percentage point increase over his 2000 total.

"I did my best to reach out, and I will continue to do so as the president," Bush said. "It's important for people to know that I'm the president of everybody."

=====================SNIP=======================
News Flash Bushy...mystery solved...no need to bring in Sherlock Holmes back
to active duty on this one...check this out...

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A40255-2004Jul10.html
"But he castigated the group's officers, who include President Kweisi Mfume and Chairman Julian Bond. "I would describe my relationship with the current leadership as basically nonexistent," Bush said, as reported by Knight Ridder Newspapers. "You've heard the rhetoric and the names they've called me."
====================SNIP=================
Bush refused to speak in front of the NAACP...Kerry did speak and embraced the
support of the NAACP. Point 1 as to why maybe the black vote did not pour in Bushy!

Point TWO
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A7433-2004Oct28.html
"NAACP Faces IRS Investigation

By Mike Allen
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, October 29, 2004; Page A08

The Internal Revenue Service has threatened to revoke the NAACP's tax-exempt status because the civil rights group's chairman, Julian Bond, "condemned the administration policies of George W. Bush" during a speech this summer, according to documents the group provided yesterday."
===============SNIP====================

So, Georgy Porgy, you snub the NAACP, you criticize the leaders, and then, when they just criticize you, you sic the IRS on them!!!!!!!!!!!!

Even a retard like BUSHY should be able to figure this one out, right?

"I'M THE PRESIDENT OF EVERYBODY, NOT JUST A FEW." SAYS BUSHY

http://www.ssa.gov/history/gwbushstmts2.html
"See, I'm the President of everybody, not just a few. I'm the President of people whether they voted for me or not."
==============snip=====================
This is like Bushy declaring himself king of the world.
Hey Village Idiot...News Flash...you aren't the president of Iraq,
not the president of the Soviet Union...so see, you're a LIAR!


PS...you're the Resident, not the President, and you are NOT my president you
idiot!

Krugman: Bush's Dirty Delusional Doctrine Will Collapse

"Halliburton is profiteering in Iraq — will apologists finally concede the point, now that a Pentagon audit finds overcharging? And reports suggest a scandal in Bechtel's vaunted school-repair program. But I've always found claims that profiteering was the motive for the Iraq war — as opposed to a fringe benefit — as implausible as claims that the war was about fighting terrorism. There are deeper motives here. Mr. Wolfowitz's official rationale for the contract policy is astonishingly cynical: "Limiting competition for prime contracts will encourage the expansion of international cooperation in Iraq and in future efforts" — future efforts? — and "should encourage the continued cooperation of coalition members." Translation: we can bribe other nations to send troops.

But I doubt whether even Mr. Wolfowitz believes that. The last year, from the failure to get U.N. approval for the war to the retreat over the steel tariff, has been one long lesson in the limits of U.S. economic leverage. Mr. Wolfowitz knows as well as the rest of us that allies who could really provide useful help won't be swayed by a few lucrative contracts.
If the contracts don't provide useful leverage, however, why torpedo a potential reconciliation between America and its allies? Perhaps because Mr. Wolfowitz's faction doesn't want such a reconciliation.

These are tough times for the architects of the "Bush doctrine" of unilateralism and preventive war. Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and their fellow Project for a New American Century alumni viewed Iraq as a pilot project, one that would validate their views and clear the way for further regime changes. (Hence Mr. Wolfowitz's line about "future efforts.")

In short, this week's diplomatic debacle probably reflects an internal power struggle, with hawks using the contracts issue as a way to prevent Republican grown-ups from regaining control of U.S. foreign policy. And initial indications are that the ploy is working — that the hawks have, once again, managed to tap into Mr. Bush's fondness for moralistic, good-versus-evil formulations. "It's very simple," Mr. Bush said yesterday. "Our people risk their lives. . . . Friendly coalition folks risk their lives. . . . The contracting is going to reflect that."

In the end the Bush doctrine — based on delusions of grandeur about America's ability to dominate the world through force — will collapse. What we've just learned is how hard and dirty the doctrine's proponents will fight against the inevitable.

Excerpted from "A Deliberate Debacle" in the Op-Ed section of the Decmber 12, 2003 New York Times "

Iraq Invasion Was 'Worth It' Bush Says

"President Bush says he was right to topple Saddam Hussein even though there were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. That was the president's biggest justification for invading Iraq. Mr. Bush says he is looking forward to a second term where he will continue the fight against terrorism and will try to be more careful about what he says.
President Bush says he is excited about the opportunities ahead, hopeful for peace, and appreciative of the chance to serve a second term as he prepares to take the Oath of Office again next week.

In an interview with ABC television, Mr. Bush said it was worth it to invade Iraq even though U.S. inspectors have concluded there were no chemical or biological weapons as the president warned.

"I felt like we would find weapons of mass destruction," he said. " Like many here in the United States and around the world, like the United Nations thought there would be weapons. We need to find out what went wrong. Saddam Hussein had the desire to reconstitute a weapons program, and the world is safer without him in power."
==============================SNIP=========================
DELUSIONAL and CALLOUS DISREGARD FOR HUMAN LIFE!

US voters 'endorsed Iraq policy'

"President George W Bush has said his re-election has vindicated his administration's policy on Iraq.
Mr Bush said there was no need to hold any of his officials accountable for mistakes or misjudgements in pre-war planning or managing the aftermath.

In an interview in Sunday's Washington Post he said that his re-election was an "accountability moment".

The publication of the interview comes as Mr Bush prepares for the start of his second term on Thursday.

The newspaper asked Mr Bush why no-one had been held responsible for wrong information about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq or mistakes made after the US-led war.

"Well, we had an accountability moment, and that's called the 2004 election," he replied.

"And the American people listened to different assessments made about what was taking place in Iraq, and they looked at the two candidates, and they chose me, for which I'm grateful."

==================SNIP=========================
Hmmmmm....dead people voting, Diebold machines, votes for Kerry just tossed..yeah,
real mandate Bushy...LOLOLOL.....

Who gave the orders Graner followed?

""I didn't enjoy it," Graner testified. "A lot of it was wrong. A lot of it was criminal."

Graner said he was obeying his superiors."
=========SNIP================
Let's see...usually, the top guy is ultimately accountable for what the underlings do if he or she is in charge,....who would ultimately be responsible?

The Commander-in-Chief...George W. Bush. He has said he is the commander-in-chief and doesn't HAVE to explain his reasons for doing things. As Lucille Ball (Lucy Ricardo) used to hear from Ricky...."BUSHY..you got some 'splaining to do!"

http://www.sonoran-sunsets.com/qualified.html
" But as commander in chief he quickly became imperious. Answering a question from Bob Woodward in 2002 about whether he was listening to staff and advisers as he prepared for war, Bush said: "Of course not. I'm the commander. See, I don't have to explain why I say things. ... I don't feel like I owe anybody an explanation."